The Doctors at Assmatrix.com will now see your first patient who has asked for us to analyze this body and tell them why -although hundreds of men want to bone the lady in this picture, and call her ‘THICK’- we have a problem with her/others calling her ‘THICK’. Why people call ‘big’ girls ‘thick’ (since they take offense to being called ‘FAT’- I hope you knew that), is another discussion we’ll point out soon, in a following blog (make them feel good about themselves so you can score sex on low hanging fruit -shameless fellas!). Anyway, here is the body being examined:
The first thing I mentioned was this chick was a bit on the heft side but was gorgeous as hell, regardless. Just because someone is not THICK, that doesn’t mean that person is not SEXY! Let’s get that straight… with that being said, not everyone showing you a bunch of skin is sexy either… nor is every chick who is a BBW with huge breasts a ‘THICK WOMAN‘. First, please read up on what makes you THICK vs PLUMPER, that will help you gain understanding as to why this is NOT a thick woman. She’s a big girl, yes, but big does not mean THICK, but she’s definitely NOT ROSIE O’DONNEL’s body either! She’s a plumper, someone who must have had a banging body, or much smaller body, even might have been thick, once upon a time, but now is pudgy in areas that were once well rounded/defined. As muscle that made her THICK, is now gone and dissolved into fat, technically/logically, you can’t call that ‘THICK’ anymore! Now it’s just soft, comfortable pudge that when you see it in jeans, it LOOKS like it’s thick meat that doesn’t wiggle around with every step taken. Trust me, you see this body moving you’ll see how it’s not THICK, photos play tricks on our eyes. Still plumper chicks can be very hot too, don’t sleep! So let’s dissect why this woman in the picture is NOT THICK, but a plumper instead:
Analyze this:
Distractions:
We start with the obvious distraction, HER HUGE BREAST, AND CUTE FACE- you can’t see but I’ve other photos of her face, she’s cute. Also, she’s showing SKIN, lots of it because she’s a big girl, however she won’t show you anything in that midsection! She’s hiding it in a huge WWE CHAMPIONSHIP BELT!!! lol Shit looks like a weight lifting belt! It’s another way to get you not to think of her huge midsection as disgusting, rather you’ll say it’s quite fashionable- the metrosexual you are. lol Most are distracted with top-heaviness, but big tits have NOTHING TO DO WITH BEING THICK!! Get that into your skull. Notice the midsection. To be a thick woman, a real thick woman, there needs to be a clear distinction between where the waist/hips start and where the ass begins, then following, where the ass separates from the thighs. This midsection is just a big GUT! There is no taper that defines a sexily shaped woman! Do you see any hips? None to be found! Also, look at the butt, where does it begin? See where it connects to saggy meat under the leg? See the legs, where is the definition at? It’s all just 1 big pudge mound of a body, that happens to have big tits. NOT THICK! What would it look like if it were thick? hmmm let’s try to imagine:
BEFORE
AFTER (BYAAAMMMM!!!)
BIG DIFFERENCE!!! Now tell me you won’t stop avoiding being seen with her, in public, or around your boys now!!! Tell me you wouldn’t take her on dates where you go to eat at places other than the food-court at your local mall! Upgrade her to a Scottish restaurant- MCDONALDS and let her supersize, boy! See there we cut the fat off of the places that were keeping her from having form, by working miracles on her midsection and legs. The point that is proved here is that MIDSECTIONS COUNT FOR EVERYTHING when calling someone THICK. It only looks thick in jeans because it’s really big like the original picture but compacted and restricted in jeans. If her meat were at tight as it looks in jeans, you’d say it’s thick. This one’s officially a plumper, but a plumper that is going to get some good pene regardless!!!
[ratings]
Ok fellas……What is a “plumper” really? This chick looks like she can shop @ “Pretty Girl” with no problem…lol…Yeah her boobs are huge and definitely not in proportion to her frame and she might be hiding a post-baby gut but she isn’t a “big” girl at all. She looks like she might be all of a size 10/max and she looks short so she may be actually smaller in number size. When I hear “big” girl, I think in terms of Toccara, Mia Amber, and etc……..Now are plumper and fat interchangeable? Maybe I am being a typical woman but there are degrees of fat, right? Dudes wouldn’t want to be seen in public with Monique or Roseanne but a woman like Joanna Borgella, a dude would definitely rock in public? These are the lingering questions that ina mujer con carne, like myself ponders? So first let’s set a standard of what a plumper REALLY is…..It should have a size requirement like 12 and over because the girl in this foto is NOT a big girl.
Well if she were a few sizes smaller and then just exploded from a baby, if the form is still maintained, she’s a plumper. Women hate hearing the word ‘FAT’ so they say ‘big’ or ‘thick’, but no one would call themselves a plumper, but we think of fat as really obese. By doctor’s charts, if you’re any bit overweight for your height, you’re obese, so there are way too many ways to get overlytechnical with the word ‘fat’. We’ll associate that with really obese, how about that? This IS A PLUMPER and she’s listed as size 16! This IS THICK bt is listed as size 14! You can’t go by store size of clothes alone! The thick one is a model/athlete. More muscle. The other, like you say, might have popped up a baby and that’s why she has those hulk hogan fat sized fat arms. But we know ladies like to say they have ‘baby fat’ when they last baby they dropped was over 10 years ago! lol Plumper is a plumper, whenever you happened to be captured on film as one! Who KNOWS what she is now… but she’s a ‘minority’ so she’s likely to get fatter.
Well we aren’t going to go by a doctor’s chart because that isn’t always accurate. So let’s go by the visual…I know a muscular 14 isn’t the same as a fat 14 because we both know muscle weighs more than fat but and more compact. So let’s say a woman weighing 170 ,but is all muscle, would look smaller than a woman weighing 160 but is not fit or muscular at all. Is it safe for me to say that the size of a woman isn’t necessarily the issue, it is how it is packaged? So for you guys……it’s not about the size per se- it’s whether or not it is muscle? That’s the thing with all this- what someone considers fat is relative…..you know like dicks!
So fat, big, or whatever is tolerable as long as when she drops her pants, it looks half way decent? lmao Hell, we need to make a dick matrix because Lord knows the disappointments that ladies face when dudes drop their pants and there’s nothing there…….lmao snapping out of it* I digress- give me some clarity so I can know whether to run my fat ass to the gym or eat a whole pig! lmao 
http://l.yimg.com/www.flickr.com/images/spaceball.gif This is Joanne Borgella
How about? A good friend of mine- Jamil…..a working plus size model.
http://viewmorepics.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=viewImage&friendID=11252646&albumID=99817&imageID=16270536
I think an important thing to remember is that they’re simply trying to define those grey areas in body types that get needlessly lumped together. The term plumper is actually there to help these women by not deceiving them into thinking that they are melyssa ford or something. And also to keep them from thinking their fat either. The problem is the term plumper is one that has already bean adopted by many to become synonymous with fat, albeit in a somewhat subtle way. Might I suggest you call them “comfy” or perhaps “bread” or “printers”(because you tend to leave hand prints in them). The fact is that regardless of the name for it I believe that AssMatrix is simply trying to define it and not make any statement about their attractiveness as that is 100% subjective. I would absolutely pork the woman in that picture, depending on her facial features. But at no point would I call her thick. I’d say she’s full, top heavy, stacked, whatever. But not thick.
bwajaja Printers lol I like that… I’d think more like ‘MEMORY FOAM’ lol You poke them in the belly they make that Pillsbury ‘OOH HOOOOO’ sound. lol Ah they’re so adorable. lol You ask blacks and latinos, they’ve mostly never even heard of a plumper! That was something used in the white community for women who were thick to fat. Anything that wasn’t that starving for food anorexic chicks that BillK likes was considered fat. They didn’t have any words for what we knew as ‘thick’, “apple bottom” booties? they didn’t even WANT to look at that. I was surprised that Vida Guerra even got famous from being in a white boy’s magazine- then again, young white dudes know the deal with nice asses, while pop /pop pop might not. Women fluctuate so much, we HAVE to try to give some clarity to the ‘grey area’. Good looking out, Professor.
[...] AssMatrix: Reloaded wrote an interesting post today on Make me BOOTIFULâ