FRONT-SIDE EDITION: PART 1
(BACK-SIDE EDITION is PART 2 to this piece)
We get a lot of message and emails from fans who are becoming more and more depressed about their own booties, after seeing it get worse and worse through the years. Many of the ladies who write us start off bragging about how nice their booties are, but then all they’re doing is trying to pull off tricks to make the booty look better than it really is. They also will source pictures from the net, or of themselves, where there are large collections of meat on their bodies, or where others have applied photoshop to various body parts, to make them bigger. When we correct the fans, they become a bit more at ease and understanding of what we feel is a nice booty/body, but then become really confused because they realize that they’ve been telling themselves lies (or have been lied to by other women and their men). Since women in western societies rely on tricks to get by way too much (rather than put in real work to achieve a nice booty/body), some of the fans become upset when we ask them to take pics of themselves without doing the tricks to look better, and it shows us that they know we’re right about what we said. Too many are too heavily reliant on lying to themselves, by using trick photography/clothing/angles and then curse us and wish they never spoke with us. There are many things at play, which lead to the mixed emotions about what we talk about here, but in the end, most fans read out writing and come back to us, asking…
… and the other half of the people writing in about the same type of issue, are the dudes who are mad at us because we made them wake up about booties/bodies that don’t SCALE well, when the women get fatter. Lots of Ethnic men are PISSED at their ladies after reading our site, because they see that they’re being shortchanged and demand their women hit a damn gym. The guys realize they have been idiots for a long time, allowing the tricks to work on them, causing them to overpraise something that is not as hot as they originally thought. Well that’s not on the women, in this case, that’s on you for letting over exposed skin skew your vision and common sense, so that you can make a bad situation look/feel better to yourself, so you can get through sex with that lady. That’s on you! Alas, this is not just a guy problem, because a lot of women writing to Send Your Pics are disappointed and/or upset because they too believed the hype- and of course they mostly blame the many men they’ve slept with for not telling them that they’ve been slipping through the years. What boyfriend/husband is really going to do that and shatter your fragile ego, ladies? Not someone wishing to stay with you. And who doesn’t know that they’re getting sloppier with each day? Nonsesense excuses. So we’ll step through a couple of common things that there are misconceptions about (especially if we’ve confused you previously with our philosophies). We’ll tackle the issue from two, separate view points (FRONT-SIDE vs BACK-SIDE) because too many people have big problems sizing up ladies from these two angles, since they don’t tend to suggest the z-axis.
For starters, most of these guys, and the girls, are tricked into assuming a lot about a woman’s backside based on her FRONTAL look in 2-D is like. When they look at a woman’s body from the front..They assume that she has a nice, full ass because her hips, and or legs are wide and fat. That is a BAD way to think, because there are tricks that women do to play a dude based on these assumptions, she’s even doing it as we look. You look at this pic above and you says “she’s thick”, or “she has real curves”, but just because someone girth to them, that doesn’t mean they have a nice ass, or even an ass at all!
Even worse, just because you get a view like this below (backshot view), it doesn’t mean that the woman has a nice, big booty either, yet you’re looking RIGHT AT IT! So WTF, right? We’ll tackle that in the next piece. It’s a dual assault on your brain! Two common shots women take, two common views we also all see in person and get twisted, they’re both not to be trusted. We let the mind play pranks to translate a 2-D (or perceived head-on view) image to what our imaginations thinks we would like to see it in 3-D. We think ‘WIDE’ and then translate into “THICK WITH HOURGLASS FIGURE AND BIG OL’ BOOTY!” If you thought this about these 2 shots, you’re like most of us. Welcome to the AssMatrix.com version of the TV show “BRAIN GAMES”. lol The funny part about this revelation is that there are even more people out there who pray you stay confused about what you’re seeing, because their egos, and profits depend on fooling you. READ ON…
Of all of the typical inquiries we get receive from people, daily, a great bulk of them we will answer simply, in this blog and part 2 of the blog. They are important because a lot of people say they are mislead by others, and are mad at us for working them up. We talk about a lot of classes of booty, we talk about how to spot what type of booty, but the backside is very hard for most people to analyze, or even come to grips with when people do learn that truth about their shapes. Most people are very confused because they’re being distracted by other things going on, outside of the what the booty meat really is. So we will look at the same problem, from the front, and in a later post, from the backside. We will cover the front right now, and there are a few problem areas, on a woman’s body from the front, which complicates the views of most onlookers, so we will quickly step through these GOTCHA areas, so people can see for themselves, why they’re faking themselves out.
We will show you what’s actually not accurate about what you might think, about a typical shot like this, too..
because it plays into the problem we see going on, and why so many believe this shot means a woman has a nice ass because bulges in JEANS means this woman has a juicy bubble butt- and 95% of the time, you’ll be wrong about that! These shots are why many women have relied on JEAN THERAPY, because of what YOU assumed about the booty/body of the women in the pics with such bulges! See if you can spot what’s wrong with the pics (where does your eye go to first)?
HUMP-ME DUMP-ME (humpty dumpty)
Many women resort to trying to trick a man into thinking they’re body is one way or another, obviously to look better and feel better about themselves, and as we said many times before, you’re only poisoning yourself mentally, as well as physically. You’re faking out yourself, and some unsuspecting idiot guy with your fakeness, then when you rope him in, you’re hoping that you’ve likely whored yourself out so much that he won’t notice all the false tricks you’ve tried to rope-a-dope (literally). Why would you think that anyone would actually want to stay with you, or keep it real with you, when you’re whole premise was about being fake and you got him by being fake? The fact that you can’t be yourself, or work on yourself if you don’t like what you look like (if it can be helped), leads you to mental poison. A cousin of this poison is telling us things like “I didn’t know I was fat and not thick, because no one complained” or “Everyone told me I had a superb ass, but looking at it (now that I’m single), it was all bullshit” or “you know how much DICK I get???!!! Yall don’t know what you’re talking about”. That last one, that a woman who gets sexed by a bunch of guys is verification that her ass is nice, is just so funny but we hear it a lot. That is NOT a way to know if you have a nice ass, that’s more of a testament to your licentiousness. Most cases, dude sare already talking about getting with the next lady after he realizes he’s been duped. Those are quotes from fans to us, and we are also saddened when we read that stuff. The real problem though, is with these ladies not getting with reality, ultimately, and you can’t go blaming someone else for what you look like- unless you’re blaming your parents or your name is Charla Nash. You watch your body change, through the years, you should know better. But it turns out that many ladies (or men for that matter), don’t even know basic body shapes, which is the start of the confusion, when they come at us like we are speaking evil about their figures. Most women, who think they are thick (or men think are thick) are really just dumpy women whom have lost form, due to getting really fat. If you have the shape of a 55 year old pear shaped woman, you should not be so proud of your figure if you’re under 40. What we notice is that just like many other definitions we like, the terms of body types are being blurred by ladies, as women who like tricks are trying to change the body type (not ass type in this scenario) to be a better one than they have, with sorcery. Just because we point it out, that doesn’t make us the bad people.
Women and men don’t understand that like we do for booty, there are countless people whom have done the same for other parts of the body, especially created by women for women. Even worse, most women don’t know the differences in their body types being classified by shape/width, similar to what we do with booty. So when we speak to women, they don’t know the difference between types of bodies that we are concerned mostly with, the HOUR GLASS SHAPED and the SPOON SHAPED bodies, and lastly concerned with RULER (spongebob shaped women) and CONE (chicks with no hips and boy-bodies).
Just like women, whom don’t care about their health, want to fake like they’re ‘THICK” with “APPLE BOTTOMS” when they’re far from it, women try to fake like they’re HOURGLASS SHAPED when they’re just PEAR SHAPED or APPLE SHAPED
The breakdown, technically, is in 3 scientific shapes (ectomorph, mesomorph and endmorph).
The ENDOMORPH is where the controversy and deception exists (for the purpose of this piece). To not bore you, or us, we’ll stick with the common folk language of apple and pears and shit lol Make a note of the skeletal body of the common woman, and where skin comes in, then compare it with the various shapes.
A LOT of people don’t know where the woman’s hips are and confuse other parts of the body for hips, but HOPE you don’t know what’s what either!
The differences between Apple vs Pear shaped is where the weight and FAT (and bone distortion) is distributed (north and south), in relation to the body overall, judging simply by the waistline location. The Hourglass vs Spoon is how the body looks with the effects of the hip/hips-fat/leg-fat as it shapes the body, in relation to your waistline position. So you can be pear shaped or apple shaped and still not have nice hips, or have hips that show through your fat body. A LOT of women are one of these two body shapes (apple or pear), and they have no hips, or have hips but you can’t see the hips because they’ve too much fat in the midsection. So what these women tend to do is try to cheat and imagine that they have hips, or try to highlight hips that just aren’t there. A great amount of women do this, just as common as putting on high heels and makeup, each day. They’re trying to make you think they have an hourglass figure, when really they likely don’t have that and likely CONE or RULER shaped, but with the fat gain, their overall look is Apple or Pear shaped- the endomorph. So they’re trying to make their dumpiness look better than it really is, because they don’t want to have to do any work to look presentable. So these women pray the fat will turn them into pear shaped women, which they can turn around and say “see, I have an hour glass figure”! Sound familiar? Just like lazy and unenthusiastic women have taken over the term “THICK” and turned it into a reflection of themselves (which screams “LAZY AND UNENTHUSIASTIC” when you look at their bodies), APPLE SHAPED women have hijacked THICK, HOURGLASS-SHAPED, descriptions in order to pretend like their body is hotter than it really is, so that they don’t have to get on a diet or work out. They always want a handicap or to cheat rather than put the work in to be better and do better. So these women would love to pretend that they are hourglass shaped, spend a great deal of time tricking you into thinking it, and that’s because too many women are so fat that DUMPY and Pear Shaped is the norm now. Part of their trickery, in relation to booty, is something you might not even have noticed, but is heavily played upon by tricksters.
A simple investigation of the female bone structure, versus the skin that covers it, will allow you to see where someone’s hips are at, and let you know where the bulges don’t meet up with the hips. So women who are hoping to get dumpy are hoping to look like they have hips and booty, because everything is drooping on them making them look like the shape of GRIMACE from McDonalds. So the sagging looks is to sought after so that women can dump that junk into tight clothing and fill out the clothing as the manufacturers of the clothing designed, which is to create fake curvature where it doesn’t really exist (like bra for the whole body). This lets you know that people really don’t think that CURVATURE when referring to REAL WOMEN HAVE CURVES is equal to REAL WOMEN HAVE BULGES. If you’re calling fat clumps CURVES, you’ve no idea about the female anatomy because fat bulges are not necessarily CURVES, and if you have to fake curves, by putting on trick clothing, then how do you have CURVES, better yet, how are you a real woman- by that “real women have curves” logic? And when you stop the fooling, how do you feel about yourself when you disrobe daily? Not good, right? Some ladies make the most of out hips getting wider after child birth, and in the right cases, they look damn good with the right amount of hip fat, leg fat and booty fat. So women whom have kids should be the last one crybabying about shape when you’ve almost given the gift of hips afterwards, now you just need to get the fat and muscle in order to make that nice guitar shape!!!
Well this is what is happening to women who send us photos, and wonder Dude, Where’s My Butt??? Their booties are not scaling with the body getting fatter and wider, even worse, the rest of the body is getting fatter as a much faster rate than the booty. In many cases, the ass is becoming wider, longer, and is riddled with inconsistencies in the curvature, resulting in HUGE DENTS in the ass’ curvature. This is beyond tiny cellulite, this is huge DENTS that we call DEAD SPACE, and extra lumps and unneeded ass fat that is colliding with the legs and hips. You just never know what you’re going to get with fat growth, but it is the legs that we want to focus on here, today, which has become more of a danger as so many have started to wish for leg fat. These ladies are banking on getting cartoonishly shaped hourglass figures, by eating a bunch of trash. Sounds familiar? It’s the same tactic many women are trying to use to get a big ass, to no avail in 90% of cases. You might be asking “but why would a woman want to look dumpy and like she has hips if she’s going to be pear shaped from the front? Who wants THAT look?” Simple to answer, “because you can get guys to assume a LOT about an ass that isn’t there too, if they see you looking dumpy!”
ASS SO FAT YOU CAN SEE IT FROM THE FRONT???
* had wide hips
* had a big butt
We asked, how do you know this, and they really couldn’t answer logically. Most basically chopped it up to assuming based on race and her angling of hips. They mostly agreed that she LOOKED like you can see she has an ass just by looking at this frontal shot. In fact, this is trickery to stick out hip bones when likely this body doesn’t have the guitar shape or hourglass you thought, and you know NOTHING about what her butt looks like. This is a very effective trick!
That has lead us down a path where many women, of ALL KINDS OF ETHNICITIES (not just Blacks), are trying to overeat, or don’t care what they eat, or don’t care to try to lose weight, because they think it will pay off when the fat piles on their bodies, and they can either resort to trickery to fool a guy, and themselves, into believing they don’t have a shape problem. It’s why women’s health is at its worst ever! So with so many women being so sloppy and jacked up looking, most are too weak to reduce the bulk, so the pile on the tricks to manipulate the bulk, or try to pretend like they have HIPS and ASS in particular. Well consider what we just talked about, in relation to women faking like they have an hourglass, or trying to manipulate their apple or sloppy version of a pear shaped body (because you can have sexy pear shaped women) to be better than it really is. Is it that these women are trying to look like the photoshopped pictures that guys are putting out there where they make even skinny Asian women appear to have huge thighs and little waistlines (dp a google search for ‘THICK ASIANS” or “ASIANS with ASS” and watch the foolishness)? Or is it that these guys are looking at dumpy women are are trying to make that look better than it really is because women have tricked them into thinking it’s hot? Good questions. Each day, you look at frontal shots and you think you know what the backside looks like based on your SPANK TANK’s recollection of women you’ve seen working the tricks they do. But these tricks have a profound affect on your visions, more so than you think because MOST guys think they know how a woman’s butt looks like based on what they see from her 2-D frontal image. They mistake the hourglass for the spoon or the apple for the pear shape all the time, guys are really that damn confused, so they too just take a mental shortcut and think every woman has an hourglass shape, despite the evidence to the contrary, and guys also don’t realize they get excited about a woman’s shape from the front because they assume a lot about the back. You’re saying right now “how can they do that, and why would that turn me on when I like booty (backside only)?” You know how many dudes claim that a woman has “ASS SO FAT YOU CAN SE IT FROM THE FRONT”? Well that’s what’s happening to your brain, you assume about her back, from what you see from her front. Well… take a look at some of the most common front shots, doing tricks and some not (all of these were liked by people for the same reasons), which fans have submitted with comment, or we spoke with in chat about. See if you notice the common theme. These are shots that people referenced as “ASS SO FAT YOU CAN SEE IT FROM THE FRONT”.
Let’s start in fuller body then go down the line toward smaller.
Here is one that guys said was the classic “ASS SO FAT YOU CAN SEE IT FROM THE FRONT”. Is it true?
“Does this dress make my butt look big?” Another ASS SO FAT YOU CAN SEE IT FROM THE FRONT candidate??
Here we have a woman with a smaller upper torso and most of her weight in the lower part of the body, thus our Euro peeps said “that is the definitions of THICK with big ass” (although a front shot).
“Try to tell me that’s not all ASS RIGHT THERE! My boo is stacked!” Well look where the bulges are, then look at any anatomy book, and you tell us. Does this prove that you can see ass from the front?
… but when we showed people them 2 photo submissions (below), their logic broke down and they quickly DISMISSED these women as potential candidates for ASS SO FAT YOU CAN SEE IT FROM THE FRONT.
So why not these last two ladies (submissions 6 and 7), but submissions 1-5 seem to have this ASS SO FAT YOU CAN SEE IT FROM THE FRONT nonsense? To also add to this, the majority of those who said they dismissed these two last pictures as having that type of ass that you can see it from the front (in terms of size), they said she clearly has a nice sized and shaped ass because of the bulges you see in the sides of the body. Even guys who don’t believe in Ass so fat you can see it from the front, said that ALL of these women definitely have to had big asses given their hourglass, spoon, Pear shaped bodies. Many women say the same thing, these men are not alone in thinking this.
You hear a lot of guys say “ass so back you can see it from the front” when referring to women whom are wide bodied or have really fat legs. Well a lot of guys actually believe that crap as the bible’s word (also made up bullshit), that a woman’s ass can be seen from you viewing her body strictly from a frontal position, and claim you don’t have to look at the back for confirmation. If that’s true, then you’re seeing one sloppy, droopy ass that is slapping around the sides of her legs, coming to the front, like plastic grocery bags you’re carrying while walking from the store. lol Does anyone truly believe such crap? Haven’t you ever seen a woman coming, nice thick body, hourglass or nice pear shaped body coming in nice form, then when you check her ass as she passes, THAT ASS IS FLATTER THAN A PANINI???? You are not an observer of women if you’re NEVER had that happen, and that’s clearly a debunk of “ASS SO FAT YOU CAN SEE IT FROM THE FRONT”. The fact is that you cannot be sure you are seeing any ass when you look at a woman head on, and most likely you’re not seeing ASS at all. There is no sound logic to that thinking because flat out you’re viewing her front, not her back, you idiots! You’re keying in on something else that doesn’t necessarily make a booty look better, it likely makes a booty look WORSE actually. Consider submissions 1-7, they all featured something that was meant to confuse, featured something many openly complain they are confused about (or how to address), or feature things that a great many quickly mistake for validation that a woman has a nice, big ass.
The people who eliminated submissions 6 and 7 from having that Ass so fat you can see it from the front, are referring to the HIPS and LEG FAT they see bulging, even jumping off of the damn pictures, in some of those shots. They are essentially mistaking the sides of a woman’s body for actual booty meat, without even having really seen the booty itself. THAT is the sickness, letting your brain make up shit about the back, when you haven’t seen the back! And that is what a lot of manufacturers of woman’s clothing, and women themselves obviously, are hoping for. An ignorant man is a goon you can gank over and over and he will eventually become complicit in the stupidity and believe the lies. That’s when you have the fever and sickness, you’re getting all hyped up over something that is not ass. If you ask us if it’s possible that a woman can have the bulges on the side of her body, but actually have a nice, big ass, the answer is HELL YES! But that’s not the full story, because what you are seeing is not her booty, so just by looking at a front picture, we would NEVER tell you that someone has a nice ass, there is no evidence, so we don’t call it! What we can say, is like in that picture on the left, there is a clear difference on the side of her body, when it comes to bulging of the hips (there is very little there) versus bulging on the thighs! There is a big bulge on the thighs but people still thought that leg fat is caused by a big booty. Can you imagine if that ass ended as low as the leg fat sits? Would that be a nice ass? See where her crotch ends? Now look where her booty would have to end if that leg fat was booty and realize how terrible and long that ass would be.
Another common misconception is that where this lady on the left has that big bulge of leg fat that suddenly jumps out, if a woman has really big and long fat thighs (like the lady in the picture to the right), then that’s a clear indicating of ass so fat you can see it from the front. Again, you see the hips bulging and you would assume that normally an ass would be so good if it would be around that area, and you even begin to think her ass is in that area, but you just don’t know. You see really huge, fat legs and you just want it to be true so badly, as she is throwing those hips at the camera. Why she is throwing those hips at the camera we will talk about shortly, but in any case here, you can’t tell what a woman’s ass looks like from the front. If you’re assuming that because a woman doesn’t have wide hips and really large legs, that she can’t have an ass, that’s not the proper way to diagnose whether a woman has a nice or big ass. The problems is people are linking those saddlebags to what they think is where the hips are and are confusing the positioning of the hips, as many women want you to. The result is you think the curvature of the woman, as it makes up the hourglass figure, is at the legs, when it should be at the waistline- unless you SPECIFICALLY are looking for DUMPY, Pear shaped women!!!!
You want to see an example of why? Look here
Now THAT, that’s a PEFECT ASS! Apple Bottom to be exact. You didn’t see that from the front and you didn’t see bulging hips. And note the position of the saddlebags to where her hips are.
REALITY CHECK ON THAT: So what is going on in that pic?
Let’s take this Ass so fat… nonsense to school.
The reality of the situation is this woman above has nice ass, and it’s a big, nice ass, which happens to be an Apple Bottom. This booty isn’t dependent on width, across the backside, which would pile into leg fat. This booty is dependent on GIRTH from off of the backside, popping out, and not hanging low, but being somewhat perky. So the bulges on the left side shot do not correspond to the booty you see on the right side. The low bulge you see on the thigh, in both shots, is simply LEG FAT!!! That right there, is one of the big problems with people improperly diagnosing booty from the front. You didn’t know she had that ass, and at best, it would be a wide, long ass if you thought you could see it from the front. The specific problem of this shot, using that dumb logic of Ass So Fat You Can See It From The Front is a great many people are thrown off by saddlebag, and others are trying to prey on that for LIKES.
Yes, you are getting excited over basically what is in the left inset picture, SADDLEBAGS, the Arch Enemies that you are mistaking for hips! Legs with fat pouring out the side of them, sloshing about as a woman walks, or stuffed into tight pants, you guys LOVE THAT and don’t even know. A lot of women will use the combination of leg fat and hip bones to try to make it look like 1 long continuation of curvature, trying to fake the hourglass or guitar shape, and a pear shaped body that has continuous curvature is a very sexy look, when pulled off properly, which is why many women with terrible shapes are aiming at the smooth dumpy pear shaped look. Other women, when they know they’ve no hips structure to show off, or booty to show off, or just have some hips and no booty, they will try to THROW HIPS in photos, or THROW LEG FAT in photos, by learning and accentuating the projection of the bulges they think is sexy curvature, of either leg fat or hips. See, for many women, a lumpy outside of the body is like GOLD when you keep eating crap and getting fat, because someone’s going to think that’s sexy curvature, especially if you contort your body to make dudes think they can accurately detect how nice your ass is from the front. Women want you to think that the tricks are real booty and hips so they need you to believe Ass so fat you can see it from the front is a real thing. So many women, of all walks of life, like to throw leg/hips in shots and dudes are clearly crossed up over them, so much so that you’re in love with fat thighs, the NEW DEFINITION OF ‘LEG MEN’. Yes they do, in fact, the thing is you see women do it all the time, and never really notice it until you see it done so poorly that you bust out laughing when you see it lined up for you, like so:
CASE STUDY: HIP TOSSES & SADDLEBAG POINTINGIn the left shot she is throwing those hips and that leg fat, trying to make 1 continuous curve, but you can clearly see where the hips start and end, and when the leg fat bulge comes in. Most people don’t catch that, but isn’t that a very awkward position to take a picture in? You wonder what the point of a shot like that is about, then you see the middle shot, even more odd. What is she projecting towards the camera? Well you can see those hips are pretty straight and not as round as you might have thought in the left shot and her waist is pretty BOXY really. Then you see a fat collection she is projecting which is a combo of low hanging ass fat and leg, and that’s what she is projecting. This is her attempt at showing you “ASS SO FAT YOU CAN SEE IT FROM THE FRONT”. It would have been impressive if the bulge came higher up, at about where the hips started to look so squared. The important shot is the last shot, where you can see it’s a Pig Tail. The ass fat doesn’t build until under the body, projected downward, and it’s meshed with leg fat because it took on too much leg fat on this body, although she’s not a really fat woman. All it takes is for you not to have any real separation of booty, back and hips for your ass to become completely undone! So women know this, if they have this situation, and they do that shot that is the left shot, and don’t bother to let you see the backside, because then you will know for sure that you’ve been fooled and ASS SO FAT YOU CAN SEE IT FROM THE FRONT doesn’t work!
What many guys like are indeed the fat legs, but most so that they be WIDE and FULL, so if her ass is flat, these guys can pretend that all that space of her backside is ass. Many guys don’t want to admit this but they like a pancake ass with fat, wide legs! They’re not really ass men, they’re fat/wide-leg men, and that’s all good too, but stop believing your broads have nice, big asses when all they are, are wide loads, or simply just admit that you like VERY DUMPY LOOKING WOMEN, like the guy who put this picture together (and named it like he did “the_hips_of_mal_malloy_by_buddhajeff”).It’s all good to like dumpy chicks, but call your obsession what it is, and not booty appreciation. This picture is not about her HIPS. HIPS? You’re not looking at hips, you’re looking referring to her LEG FAT and how it bulges in jeans or dresses! You like how her fat explodes as it lands on the legs, as opposed to how her top half of the body looks (which although also chubby, looks very tiny compared to her lower half of the body). You guys who are fooled into thinking that a chick has a nice, big ass just because she has really fat legs, need to do a second take on these ladies, and know exactly what you like when looking at them. Sure, this pic above was another “Ass so fat you can see it from the front” entry but you already know how her butt looks, so it’s easy to mark this woman as that kind of woman. That logic you have falls apart when we examine MOST women, whom are doing the hip tosses, and projecting the fat of the legs in shots, hoping you mistake it for real booty. That logic falls apart when you see women in the trick clothing, trying to disguise the leg and back fat with form shifting clothing, that channels the fat to make it look like a smooth continuous dumpiness look, or a dumpy look where they make an ass from smashing hips, butt and leg fat all together. Remember that picture above with the girl in the jeans?
She wasn’t wearing the kind of jeans that takes that slop of fat and packs it all in to make 1 big butt/hips/legs bulge of dumpiness, she is wearing regular pants for bigger sizes that don’t have any fat containment mechanisms. So the fat just sloshes around from side to side as she walks, but that’s LEG FAT and not ass fat. That is the typical body you’re looking at from the front and claiming she must have an ass based on that. You see it all day every day and then it walks by and you get upset when her backside doesn’t deliver what you thought it would. you get a puzzled look on your face like “wtf? What happened?!” when she passes and you see that ass is FLAT. That disappointment, if you’ve felt it, is you realizing that logic of Ass so fat … not being true, and it can make you upset, seriously! lol Fucking dudes start complaining to each other when they’re standing around and “call it” too soon, telling their boys “oh shit look at that, that ass is crazy fat, son!” Then she passes, everyone sees that you were WRONG, you scratch your head and dudes LAUGH AT YOU… as you sit in silence, confused and try to defend your bad pick. LOL Yeah you’ve done that! Dudes overpraising that bulge in the wrong place has lead to many women trying to seek that bulge in the wrong place. Women with no ass need you to believe in Ass so fat.. nonsense so that as their legs get fatter, you actually agree she should continue to get fatter, because you think you’re getting a bigger ass because she’s widening. You think you’re getting HIPS when she doesn’t have hips or a nice taper, because her lower body is getting fatter.
Ultimately, it’s clear that you aren’t really looking at and loving booty, you’re loving LEG FAT that widens the body!!! We thought we lost men who like looking at a woman’s legs, but no, you’ve just evolved into saddlebag lovers masquerading as ASS MEN.
and many of us like HIPS, especially when they’re making that hourglass or guitar-shaped figure on a woman, but again, too many mistaking that front look for a woman being THICK or having a nice ass is killing booty appreciation, because women are pigging out trying to get leg fat to look like hips, purposely making themselves dumpy because they too now believe in ass so fat you can see it from the front mentality. You see them throwing hips in pics and never taking ass shots but taking 100 frontal pics with the same trick! You know why, we all know why, because 2-D flat frontal pics don’t indicate anything about a woman’s backside. So these women have falsely believed that if they make their bodies wider, especially after the hip line, that they’ll score big points. These are some strange times when a woman doesn’t want an hourglass figure, but rather wants to look dumpy like a 50 year old woman. Both the women and men who think that this leg fat, widening technique is going to work, need to come to the realization that it doesn’t impact your booty like you think it does, and in part 2 we will show you why it FAILS 9 times out of 10!
You simply can’t tell that because a woman has fat legs and wide hips that she has a big ass (nice or not), and gaining fat legs actually will likely ERASE whatever little ass you might have. Then you, or the logic you have to get bigger, falls as flat as the shot below (how did throwing hips/leg fat with those fat legs, work out there? Just like it does for 90% of people).
stay tuned for part 2, the backside edition.